<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prestige</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hotsdots.com/2010/05/prestige/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hotsdots.com/2010/05/prestige/</link>
	<description>A Restoration Druid and Shadow Priest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 10:24:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SlikRX/Balthazario</title>
		<link>http://www.hotsdots.com/2010/05/prestige/comment-page-1/#comment-2645</link>
		<dc:creator>SlikRX/Balthazario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 23:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotsdots.com/?p=4827#comment-2645</guid>
		<description>I guess I would see the &quot;viable&quot; meaning &quot;able to do this path without suffering snark and vitriol about your ability and your choices.&quot;

I don&#039;t raid either 10 or 25 man with any regularity. I will chose a 25 man for loot, and a 10 man for personalities, but I&#039;m not invested in either. Generally I will take whichever is available.

I will say there is a general cultural &quot;look down your nose&quot; attitude towards players that prefer to run 10 man. &quot;Not good enough&quot; or &quot;not smart enough&quot; or &quot;not dedicated enough&quot; seem to be the underlying implied reason.

Can you tell any of this by looking at GS, EG or a *quick* armory check? Nope. Nobody is running around Dalaran belittling individual 10-man players. But read the blogs and forums and the attitude is VERY prevalent.
.-= SlikRX/Balthazario&#039;s last blog: &lt;a href=&quot;http://bang-n-blame.blogspot.com/2010/05/wild-horses-and-other-oddities.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wild Horses and Other Oddities&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I would see the &#8220;viable&#8221; meaning &#8220;able to do this path without suffering snark and vitriol about your ability and your choices.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t raid either 10 or 25 man with any regularity. I will chose a 25 man for loot, and a 10 man for personalities, but I&#8217;m not invested in either. Generally I will take whichever is available.</p>
<p>I will say there is a general cultural &#8220;look down your nose&#8221; attitude towards players that prefer to run 10 man. &#8220;Not good enough&#8221; or &#8220;not smart enough&#8221; or &#8220;not dedicated enough&#8221; seem to be the underlying implied reason.</p>
<p>Can you tell any of this by looking at GS, EG or a *quick* armory check? Nope. Nobody is running around Dalaran belittling individual 10-man players. But read the blogs and forums and the attitude is VERY prevalent.<br />
.-= SlikRX/Balthazario&#8217;s last blog: <a href="http://bang-n-blame.blogspot.com/2010/05/wild-horses-and-other-oddities.html" rel="nofollow">Wild Horses and Other Oddities</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shiva</title>
		<link>http://www.hotsdots.com/2010/05/prestige/comment-page-1/#comment-2622</link>
		<dc:creator>Shiva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 18:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotsdots.com/?p=4827#comment-2622</guid>
		<description>I think there is a good deal of truth to this.

It&#039;s worth noting, when we (and by we I mean me and my guildies) initially set up pugs or &quot;events&quot; (acheivements, pvp tournaments, fun galas, etc) it&#039;s fairly customary we look at the top 4-5 guilds first, and get friends. We don&#039;t go to the &quot;public&quot;. 

For example, we&#039;re trying to finish up some Ulduar acheivements, on my server we&#039;d fire off with /who Exigence, /who Reckoning... but we already know those are the same type of people to us. The people who care about this stuff.

In my eyes, this is kind of like a professional sport. The Miami Dolphins might have a strong rivalry with the New York Jets; but no matter how you slice it, both teams are going to respect each other. Someone on the Dolphins might not know a thing about the Arena Football League or heck even Basketball, but they&#039;ll definitely know about the Jets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is a good deal of truth to this.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s worth noting, when we (and by we I mean me and my guildies) initially set up pugs or &#8220;events&#8221; (acheivements, pvp tournaments, fun galas, etc) it&#8217;s fairly customary we look at the top 4-5 guilds first, and get friends. We don&#8217;t go to the &#8220;public&#8221;. </p>
<p>For example, we&#8217;re trying to finish up some Ulduar acheivements, on my server we&#8217;d fire off with /who Exigence, /who Reckoning&#8230; but we already know those are the same type of people to us. The people who care about this stuff.</p>
<p>In my eyes, this is kind of like a professional sport. The Miami Dolphins might have a strong rivalry with the New York Jets; but no matter how you slice it, both teams are going to respect each other. Someone on the Dolphins might not know a thing about the Arena Football League or heck even Basketball, but they&#8217;ll definitely know about the Jets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shiva</title>
		<link>http://www.hotsdots.com/2010/05/prestige/comment-page-1/#comment-2621</link>
		<dc:creator>Shiva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 18:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotsdots.com/?p=4827#comment-2621</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know. I definitely know the effects of my guild tag. I suppose it helps my guild (Exodus) has been on the server since the days of Molten Core (I am a transfer).

Exodus has always fielded renown pvpers, trade-chat trolls, forum-monkies and of course done decently well in pve. We weren&#039;t always #1, but when we weren&#039;t, we were #2.

I strongly disagree with the &quot;lol yeah right&quot;. For me, there is a huge difference the guild tag makes in regards to alts. I honestly _do_ get the benefit of the doubt, I don&#039;t need to link achievements, or gearscore or what not. I don&#039;t often offer advice, but for the most part when I comment something about the healing-setup being inefficient or what not in pugs, I find they often tend to listen.

I think however, some of this has to do with how much good will your guild generates. For example, during the Sunwell era Exodus was legendary in propping up the price of Sunmotes. People were actively farming for sunmotes exclusively to sell to us because we were paying 2,000 gold for it. We also had a reputation of selling gear throughout Black Temple and even Sunwell. 

Even in the age of Wrath, we organized pug runs (And at one point, we were organizing several pug runs). Like the other top guild on our server, we&#039;ve also taught the pugs how to &quot;do&quot; certain bosses. We more or less openly shared our non-hardmode strategies. We&#039;ve openly &quot;taught&quot; other guilds how to do fights (for example, we&#039;ve taken several &quot;officer cores&quot; from about 2-3 guilds and showed them to Vashj fight when it was hard). 

These aren&#039;t my merits, but my guild has generated a good deal of good-will on the server. And as such, it&#039;s definitely recognizable to a decent amount of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know. I definitely know the effects of my guild tag. I suppose it helps my guild (Exodus) has been on the server since the days of Molten Core (I am a transfer).</p>
<p>Exodus has always fielded renown pvpers, trade-chat trolls, forum-monkies and of course done decently well in pve. We weren&#8217;t always #1, but when we weren&#8217;t, we were #2.</p>
<p>I strongly disagree with the &#8220;lol yeah right&#8221;. For me, there is a huge difference the guild tag makes in regards to alts. I honestly _do_ get the benefit of the doubt, I don&#8217;t need to link achievements, or gearscore or what not. I don&#8217;t often offer advice, but for the most part when I comment something about the healing-setup being inefficient or what not in pugs, I find they often tend to listen.</p>
<p>I think however, some of this has to do with how much good will your guild generates. For example, during the Sunwell era Exodus was legendary in propping up the price of Sunmotes. People were actively farming for sunmotes exclusively to sell to us because we were paying 2,000 gold for it. We also had a reputation of selling gear throughout Black Temple and even Sunwell. </p>
<p>Even in the age of Wrath, we organized pug runs (And at one point, we were organizing several pug runs). Like the other top guild on our server, we&#8217;ve also taught the pugs how to &#8220;do&#8221; certain bosses. We more or less openly shared our non-hardmode strategies. We&#8217;ve openly &#8220;taught&#8221; other guilds how to do fights (for example, we&#8217;ve taken several &#8220;officer cores&#8221; from about 2-3 guilds and showed them to Vashj fight when it was hard). </p>
<p>These aren&#8217;t my merits, but my guild has generated a good deal of good-will on the server. And as such, it&#8217;s definitely recognizable to a decent amount of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Len</title>
		<link>http://www.hotsdots.com/2010/05/prestige/comment-page-1/#comment-2610</link>
		<dc:creator>Len</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 17:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotsdots.com/?p=4827#comment-2610</guid>
		<description>This makes a lot of sense - prestige is definitely something that you perceive (or perceive as being important...)  Personally a lot of my current (very minor) gripes with 10 mans are largely about the limited gear I can access (doesn&#039;t matter about ilevel, more about variety and suitability for different classes/specs/slots).  Not much I can do about that, I raid what I raid and get the rewards associated with it.

My other &#039;issue&#039; has been that 25 man guilds can clear the 10 man content incredibly easily compared to those that don&#039;t do 25 mans.  However this relies on my perception - that it matters what other guilds do, that it&#039;s not &#039;fair&#039; that they get such a leg up when tackling 10 man content, or that it&#039;s somehow important to distinguish between people who clear 10 man content with appropriate level gear and those who don&#039;t.  In the grand scheme of things none of that matters as long as I am happy within my guild and doing what I enjoy on WoW.

I&#039;d assume that many 25 man raiders have similar types of issues (if coming from an opposite viewpoint) based on personal, subjective and relative perceptions, which are leading to more of the conflicting arguments than cold hard facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes a lot of sense &#8211; prestige is definitely something that you perceive (or perceive as being important&#8230;)  Personally a lot of my current (very minor) gripes with 10 mans are largely about the limited gear I can access (doesn&#8217;t matter about ilevel, more about variety and suitability for different classes/specs/slots).  Not much I can do about that, I raid what I raid and get the rewards associated with it.</p>
<p>My other &#8216;issue&#8217; has been that 25 man guilds can clear the 10 man content incredibly easily compared to those that don&#8217;t do 25 mans.  However this relies on my perception &#8211; that it matters what other guilds do, that it&#8217;s not &#8216;fair&#8217; that they get such a leg up when tackling 10 man content, or that it&#8217;s somehow important to distinguish between people who clear 10 man content with appropriate level gear and those who don&#8217;t.  In the grand scheme of things none of that matters as long as I am happy within my guild and doing what I enjoy on WoW.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d assume that many 25 man raiders have similar types of issues (if coming from an opposite viewpoint) based on personal, subjective and relative perceptions, which are leading to more of the conflicting arguments than cold hard facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krikket</title>
		<link>http://www.hotsdots.com/2010/05/prestige/comment-page-1/#comment-2609</link>
		<dc:creator>Krikket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 16:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotsdots.com/?p=4827#comment-2609</guid>
		<description>I felt the need to do a &lt;a href=&quot;http://somuchwow.wordpress.com/2010/05/05/what-i-mean-by-viable/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;response post&lt;/a&gt; to this as well.
.-= Krikket&#039;s last blog: &lt;a href=&quot;http://somuchwow.wordpress.com/2010/05/05/what-i-mean-by-viable/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;What I mean by “viable”:&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I felt the need to do a <a href="http://somuchwow.wordpress.com/2010/05/05/what-i-mean-by-viable/" rel="nofollow">response post</a> to this as well.<br />
.-= Krikket&#8217;s last blog: <a href="http://somuchwow.wordpress.com/2010/05/05/what-i-mean-by-viable/" rel="nofollow">What I mean by “viable”:</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What I mean by &#8220;viable&#8221;: &#171; So Much WoW, So Little Time</title>
		<link>http://www.hotsdots.com/2010/05/prestige/comment-page-1/#comment-2608</link>
		<dc:creator>What I mean by &#8220;viable&#8221;: &#171; So Much WoW, So Little Time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 16:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotsdots.com/?p=4827#comment-2608</guid>
		<description>[...] Cassandri over at HoTs &amp; DoTs was a little confused about what exactly is meant when people are getting excited about 10 mans being a viable progression path in Cataclysm. She points out that Blizzard did design 10 mans to have their own progression path.  But there were a few problems with the way it actually worked: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cassandri over at HoTs &amp; DoTs was a little confused about what exactly is meant when people are getting excited about 10 mans being a viable progression path in Cataclysm. She points out that Blizzard did design 10 mans to have their own progression path.  But there were a few problems with the way it actually worked: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://www.hotsdots.com/2010/05/prestige/comment-page-1/#comment-2607</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 14:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotsdots.com/?p=4827#comment-2607</guid>
		<description>My apologies ladies, my own tiredness is playing a factor here and hurriedly reading from work -blushes profusely-

I get that what you are trying to say is that the impression of a 10-man raiding guild shouldn&#039;t be any different from a 25. Honestly, my bad ... but at the very least I made a point about people epeen chasing.

Let me clarify a little then by saying that the people who are chasing after &quot;showing off&quot; are also generally the people you don&#039;t want in a serious progression raiding guild anyways .... the types that are constantly annoying and often pretty unskilled anyways.
.-= Gareth&#039;s last blog: &lt;a href=&quot;http://altaholicsdiary.wordpress.com/2010/05/05/where-is-my-wow-going/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Where is my WoW going?&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My apologies ladies, my own tiredness is playing a factor here and hurriedly reading from work -blushes profusely-</p>
<p>I get that what you are trying to say is that the impression of a 10-man raiding guild shouldn&#8217;t be any different from a 25. Honestly, my bad &#8230; but at the very least I made a point about people epeen chasing.</p>
<p>Let me clarify a little then by saying that the people who are chasing after &#8220;showing off&#8221; are also generally the people you don&#8217;t want in a serious progression raiding guild anyways &#8230;. the types that are constantly annoying and often pretty unskilled anyways.<br />
.-= Gareth&#8217;s last blog: <a href="http://altaholicsdiary.wordpress.com/2010/05/05/where-is-my-wow-going/" rel="nofollow">Where is my WoW going?</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keredria</title>
		<link>http://www.hotsdots.com/2010/05/prestige/comment-page-1/#comment-2606</link>
		<dc:creator>Keredria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 13:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotsdots.com/?p=4827#comment-2606</guid>
		<description>Cass, in my mind viability is not about recognition from others at all. It&#039;s about the rewards, having access to the same gear.
.-= Keredria&#039;s last blog: &lt;a href=&quot;http://keredria.blogspot.com/2010/05/so-when-are-girl-scouts-following-suit.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;So when are the Girl Scouts following suit?&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cass, in my mind viability is not about recognition from others at all. It&#8217;s about the rewards, having access to the same gear.<br />
.-= Keredria&#8217;s last blog: <a href="http://keredria.blogspot.com/2010/05/so-when-are-girl-scouts-following-suit.html" rel="nofollow">So when are the Girl Scouts following suit?</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keredria</title>
		<link>http://www.hotsdots.com/2010/05/prestige/comment-page-1/#comment-2605</link>
		<dc:creator>Keredria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 13:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotsdots.com/?p=4827#comment-2605</guid>
		<description>I did read the post, I just choose to disagree with it. Or actually, I think what gets me about the post is the tone.

Ok, prestige doesn&#039;t matter in 10 man or 25 man. But when I read &quot;if 10 man raiding guilds are looking for prestige and recognition they might not get it&quot;, it sounds to me like trying to teach 10 man raiders that prestige and recognition doesn&#039;t matter, when that isn&#039;t the reason 10 man raiders want the raiding change to begin with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did read the post, I just choose to disagree with it. Or actually, I think what gets me about the post is the tone.</p>
<p>Ok, prestige doesn&#8217;t matter in 10 man or 25 man. But when I read &#8220;if 10 man raiding guilds are looking for prestige and recognition they might not get it&#8221;, it sounds to me like trying to teach 10 man raiders that prestige and recognition doesn&#8217;t matter, when that isn&#8217;t the reason 10 man raiders want the raiding change to begin with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kae</title>
		<link>http://www.hotsdots.com/2010/05/prestige/comment-page-1/#comment-2604</link>
		<dc:creator>Kae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 13:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotsdots.com/?p=4827#comment-2604</guid>
		<description>The &quot;prestige&quot; that guilds like mine are looking for is not so much in the way of &quot;hey look we&#039;re better than you, aren&#039;t I shiny?&quot; sorts of prestige, as it is about just being accepted as skilled players rather than thrown in the dirt simply for our raid format choice... to be recognized, as you say, as something other than a bunch of weak noobs who &quot;can&#039;t&quot; or won&#039;t touch 25-man content.  

I&#039;ve gotten no end of comments on my blog from 25-man raiders who laugh that I cast anything other than rejuv and wild growth.  Who laugh when I could make use of Nature&#039;s Grace but couldn&#039;t give up Living Seed for Celestial Focus, prior to getting closer to the haste softcap.  Who are confused by the possibility that I might not have all the raid buffs in my raid, or might need to spam nourish on a tank in some boss fights while healing the raid at the same time.  Who say, &quot;why the heck would you want to only run tens?&quot;  Who often also say, &quot;Tens are easy, you must suck.&quot;  It is born from ignorance, supported by their wish to feel better about themselves (bullying), and not quashed by the general community as a whole (though in turn, mostly due to lack of understanding or care).

It&#039;s not all 25-man raiders who act like this, of course.  Just a significant enough portion of them, enough so to be a constant thorn in the side of anyone who talks about ten-man raiding.  The bullies and trolls are always out there for any topic, but most of the community and moderators don&#039;t care enough (or understand) about ten-man raiders to do anything about it when those bullies start bashing on 10-man guilds.  Ten-man guilds are a minority in WotLK: strats built for ten-man guilds are extremely rare--rarer than they should be--because all too often the IDEA of ten-man raiding is questioned or laughed at when these are posted on large sites.

TBH, I think ten-man guilds will still be behind 25mans in progression in Cataclysm due to Blizzard&#039;s stated wish to have the 25-mans gear up more quickly overall.  It doesn&#039;t really bother me.  Those looking for the firsts should be looking at 25-man guilds, simply due to that expected gearing speed... it&#039;ll be the rare, exceptional 10-man guild on a server without world-top-ranking 25man guilds to get server firsts, same as it is now.  

So, from my perspective, ten-man guilds just wish to be recognized as skilled (and, in some cases, as fair or good-hearted) players by other guilds, especially guilds held in high respect by the rest of the community... but as you say in your post, that recognition only really comes through conversations and actually playing together, rather than any rank, title, or gear graphic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;prestige&#8221; that guilds like mine are looking for is not so much in the way of &#8220;hey look we&#8217;re better than you, aren&#8217;t I shiny?&#8221; sorts of prestige, as it is about just being accepted as skilled players rather than thrown in the dirt simply for our raid format choice&#8230; to be recognized, as you say, as something other than a bunch of weak noobs who &#8220;can&#8217;t&#8221; or won&#8217;t touch 25-man content.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve gotten no end of comments on my blog from 25-man raiders who laugh that I cast anything other than rejuv and wild growth.  Who laugh when I could make use of Nature&#8217;s Grace but couldn&#8217;t give up Living Seed for Celestial Focus, prior to getting closer to the haste softcap.  Who are confused by the possibility that I might not have all the raid buffs in my raid, or might need to spam nourish on a tank in some boss fights while healing the raid at the same time.  Who say, &#8220;why the heck would you want to only run tens?&#8221;  Who often also say, &#8220;Tens are easy, you must suck.&#8221;  It is born from ignorance, supported by their wish to feel better about themselves (bullying), and not quashed by the general community as a whole (though in turn, mostly due to lack of understanding or care).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not all 25-man raiders who act like this, of course.  Just a significant enough portion of them, enough so to be a constant thorn in the side of anyone who talks about ten-man raiding.  The bullies and trolls are always out there for any topic, but most of the community and moderators don&#8217;t care enough (or understand) about ten-man raiders to do anything about it when those bullies start bashing on 10-man guilds.  Ten-man guilds are a minority in WotLK: strats built for ten-man guilds are extremely rare&#8211;rarer than they should be&#8211;because all too often the IDEA of ten-man raiding is questioned or laughed at when these are posted on large sites.</p>
<p>TBH, I think ten-man guilds will still be behind 25mans in progression in Cataclysm due to Blizzard&#8217;s stated wish to have the 25-mans gear up more quickly overall.  It doesn&#8217;t really bother me.  Those looking for the firsts should be looking at 25-man guilds, simply due to that expected gearing speed&#8230; it&#8217;ll be the rare, exceptional 10-man guild on a server without world-top-ranking 25man guilds to get server firsts, same as it is now.  </p>
<p>So, from my perspective, ten-man guilds just wish to be recognized as skilled (and, in some cases, as fair or good-hearted) players by other guilds, especially guilds held in high respect by the rest of the community&#8230; but as you say in your post, that recognition only really comes through conversations and actually playing together, rather than any rank, title, or gear graphic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
